Jump to content

User talk:Sreenu S

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Sreenu S! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Jacona (talk) 15:52, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jacona for your good courage Sreenu S (talk) 15:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jishnu Raghavan has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jishnu Raghavan. Thanks! QuantumRealm (meow🦁pawtrack🐾) 15:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yah just now I saw the notification Sreenu S (talk) 15:14, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I'm not a Sockpuppet I'm created this article randomly. Sreenu S (talk) 15:15, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you are not a sock, how were you able to recreate a draft for Jishnu Raghavan which is exactly similar to the previous versions created by the blocked accounts. I'm an active content creator and intended to write the article myself after sometime. But this is quite embarrassing and irritating. Your consistent socking is simply decreasing the likelihood of a significant person's article being in Wikipedia's mainspace again. Stop socking again and request for an unblock from your original account. Thilsebatti (talk) 17:52, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See here, believing me or not is your wish yah. But I'm not a SOCK. Why you all are suspectin me like this Sreenu S (talk) 00:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jishnu Raghavan has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jishnu Raghavan. Thanks! QuantumRealm (meow🦁pawtrack🐾) 15:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not Sock, I'm not a Sock please don't suspect me I had just created this article in a good faith. It's true that I'm not a SOCK. In this wikipedia platform I'm to edit and create new article in my future. Now currently, I have 2 draft aricles. Sreenu S (talk) 16:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rah e Junoon (TV series) (December 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 16:33, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Sreenu S! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 16:33, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rah e Junoon (TV series) (December 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
CNMall41 (talk) 23:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

[edit]